diff options
| author | Michal Hanus <mikehanus@protonmail.com> | 2025-06-02 05:28:49 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Michal Hanus <mikehanus@protonmail.com> | 2025-06-02 05:28:49 +0200 |
| commit | 2634e6fdfd5ef87311deeff3709eaa76610888f8 (patch) | |
| tree | fb8737c32c1eefd9b6447d15a6f07e55e1203019 /text/uvod.tex | |
| parent | bde23520eedae819e5e14c39b47e4611fdab11a9 (diff) | |
bez diskuze a zaveru
Diffstat (limited to 'text/uvod.tex')
| -rw-r--r-- | text/uvod.tex | 9 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/text/uvod.tex b/text/uvod.tex index 2cc813c..09fb3d4 100644 --- a/text/uvod.tex +++ b/text/uvod.tex @@ -6,12 +6,13 @@ It is estimated that currently (2024/2025) there are two actively connected Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices per each person living on the planet Earth and the number will almost double furthermore until 2030, reaching nearly 30 billion connected IoT devices worldwide\cite{statista}. -At the same time, complexity of the IoT devices rises every year and so is their requirements on the underlying network infrastructure and protocols, originally designed predominantly for completely different mobile applications (text messages and voice / video streaming). Need for new IoT-related protocols started to be prominent with wide-spreading and anticipated new use-cases of IoT devices, for which \ac{GSM} and original \ac{LTE} networks were not originally intended and soon found unsuitable in terms of power efficiency, connection reliability and ability to accommodate billions of small devices with tiny average data rates. +At the same time, complexity of the IoT devices rises every year and so is their requirements on the underlying network infrastructure and protocols, originally designed predominantly for completely different mobile applications (text messages and voice/video streaming). Need for new IoT-related protocols started to be prominent with wide-spreading and anticipated new use-cases of IoT devices, for which \ac{GSM} and original \ac{LTE} networks were not originally intended and soon found unsuitable in terms of power efficiency, connection reliability and ability to accommodate billions of small devices with tiny average data rates. IoT devices today are not only simple single-purpose meteo sensors, but more and more frequently this category includes very complex vehicles and machinery, such as autonomous cars with multiple RADAR/LIDAR sensors or cooperative industrial robots, needing to communicate with the central command \& control facility and with each other in real time and with very high reliability. On the other hand large widespread of massive quantities of very low power devices in possibly critical application can also be expected. Related requirements on communication data volumes, response latency and network reliability far exceed capacity and technical possibilities of older mobile networks. Larger bandwidths, data speeds and lower latencies brought by 4G and especially 5G mobile networks are necessary for providing the appropriate working space for these new IoT devices. -The advancements in \ac{LPWAN} \ac{RF} technology in regards to power saving in weak signal decoding and subsequent longer range opens a door to vast filed of usage critical scenarios currently depended on more costly solutions with private networks. \texttt{Co to znamena???} +The advancements in \ac{LPWAN} \ac{RF} technology in regards to power saving in weak signal decoding and subsequent longer range opens a door to vast filed of usage critical scenarios currently depended on more costly solutions with private networks. -%The necessary communication protocols for 4G and 5G mobile networks are being standardized under an umbrella of \ac{3GPP} - an association of national telecommunication standardization agencies and commercial partners. \ac{3GPP} has agreed upon and released several communication protocols (so-called „releases“) for the new generations of mobile networks, unfortunately with some ambiguities in their numbering and labeling. For example, Long-term evolution (LTE) was first introduced as a 3G technology standard but it later become a 4G standard. LTE was followed by LTE-Advanced labeled as „true 4G“ or 4.5G and LTE-Advanced Pro (LTE-A Pro) that is considered 5G but sometimes it is labeled as 4.9G \cite{nokia49g}. +The goal of this thesis is to describe these gradually more and more adapted protocols. Than to practically demonstrate these capabilities with current communication modules. Both in laboratory setting with detailed measurement of their radio capabilities and power consumption and in real field scenarios. And finally use these finding to recommend in which scenario use what technology. + +%The necessary communication protocols for 4G and 5G mobile networks are being standardized under an umbrella of \ac{3GPP} - an association of national telecommunication standardization agencies and commercial partners. \ac{3GPP} has agreed upon and released several communication protocols (so-called „releases“) for the new generations of mobile networks, unfortunately with some ambiguities in their numbering and labeling. For example, Long-term evolution (LTE) was first introduced as a 3G technology standard but it later become a 4G standard. LTE was followed by LTE-Advanced labeled as „true 4G“ or 4.5G and LTE-Advanced Pro (LTE-A Pro) that is considered 5G but sometimes it is labeled as 4.9G \cite{nokia49g}. -\colorbox{orange}{Graf IoT zarizeni here} \\ |
